Different.

Child pornography?

December 26, 2009 22:18

For those whom I've not exclaimed anger randomly on MSN, I'm gonna post the frustration here.

Mothers selling pornographic images of their own child

You've got to read it.

Anyone who gets sexually aroused by images of kids wearing their underwear must be a paedophile, and apparently it reports that those are male paedophiles. It's even worser when those images weren't taken by said paedophiles, but the kids own parents, mother and/or relatives. And to think, mothers were this figure whom people look up to. Even dictionaries believe that mothers are awesome. Look after (someone) kindly and protectively, sometimes excessively so Er, taking images of child nude/with undergarments is protective? Whoever thinks that is protective, please jump off a bridge.

A 1000yen (SGD$15) per picture. That Osaka woman received 100,000yen for the pictures she sent. That's like approximately a hundred images sent to a porn collector. Seriously, is a hundred images of her own nude daughter worth only 100,000yen? Oh, let's not forget, there's videos of her nude daughter. Either that woman is really in need of money, or, is desperate to show her child's body to the world (I mean like who knows what that collector would do). I don't care if what that mother would end up to, but let's think in the eyes of her daughter. Two years old, you'd practically talk a few words, and probably understand what adults say. But if we look on the (not so)bright side, two years old, she'd practically forget what she had ever taken once she's all grown up. THEN AGAIN, if said porn collector posted the pictures on the net, and if one way or another the girl sees childhood photos of herself, naked, on the net. Her future's ruined and be damned.

It pisses me off that some 23 year old mother gets only one year jail term for doing such a thing? With all due respect to that Sendai judge because he said something good, As a mother, you committed a deed as grievous as sexual abuse against your own child, whom you are bound to protect with your very life isn't a one year jail term a light offence? If a monk gets more than a year of jail term for using funds from public for his own use, why isn't a mother who "sexually abused" her own child getting the same amount of punishment? Fine, laws of different countries. But isn't sexual abusing something much more than embezzling of funds?

We were able to make easy money Yeah, in the expense of your own child's future. As much as I love Japanese, I think it's time for Hatoyama to step in or something.

Profile

Being 16 isn't all that glamourous. 慶應義塾大学, 東京大学, 早稲田大学

Tagboard

Recent

Down Ueno Park
When the sun sets at four
Lake Ashi
Baby skin
Fixations
Something new.